Breaking Down Composable Banking: How Financial Institutions Can Future-Proof Their Tech Stack

Composable Banking is redefining the DNA of financial institutions. No longer bound by rigid, monolithic core systems, banks are embracing modular, API-driven architectures that allow them to adapt, innovate, and scale with unprecedented speed. 

As a result, Composable Banking is not just a technology shift; it’s a strategic imperative for future-proofing the tech stack and ensuring long-term competitiveness.

What Is Composable Banking?

Composable Banking is an architectural approach where banks build their technology stack from interchangeable, best-in-class modules. For instance, each module—whether it’s payments, onboarding, lending, or compliance—operates independently but communicates seamlessly via APIs. 

This modularity enables banks to swap, upgrade, or retire components without disrupting the entire system.

The Evolution to Composable Banking

Legacy banking systems are complex and costly. According to Gartner, global banks spend $650 billion annually on technology, with up to 80% of that dedicated to maintaining legacy infrastructure.

Developers at traditional banks spend only 32% of their time on innovation, while the rest is consumed by maintenance. In contrast, Composable Banking breaks this cycle, enabling rapid innovation and efficient resource allocation.

How Composable Banking Transforms Financial Institutions

It empowers financial institutions to:

1. Accelerate time-to-market: Banks adopting this architecture have reduced product launch times by up to 80%.

2. Drive revenue growth: Gartner projects that composable banks will achieve 30% higher revenue growth than peers by 2025.

3. Enhance resilience: Modular systems isolate failures, reducing systemic risk and downtime.

4. Enable seamless compliance: Regulatory changes can be implemented in targeted modules, minimizing disruption.

Real-World Example: Composable Banking in Action

Monzo, a UK challenger bank, runs on over 2,000 microservices, each orchestrated by APIs (Maveric Systems, 2024). When regulations change or new customer needs arise, Monzo updates only the relevant module, not the entire core. 

India Post Payments Bank leveraged composable onboarding to add 30 million customers in 18 months, reducing onboarding times from days to seconds (i-exceed, 2023).

Composable Banking and Customer Experience

Personalization and Speed with Composable Banking

Composable Banking is invisible to customers but transformative in impact. Modular onboarding, real-time payments, and personalized financial products are all possible because each function is a discrete, upgradeable module. The result: faster service, tailored experiences, and higher customer satisfaction.

Data-Driven Insights

a) 63% of CIOs at high-composability enterprises report outperforming competitors.

b) 73% of banking leaders plan to implement this architecture within three years.

c) Only 7% of banks are fully composable today, but adoption is accelerating.

Also Read: Composable Enterprises: Unlocking Agility Through Business and Technical Modularity

Composable Banking Marketplace: Ecosystem and Innovation

Composable Banking

 

Building a Marketplace

It enables banks to integrate third-party fintech solutions and internal modules, fostering a marketplace of best-in-class services. 

Citibank, for example, exposes its core functionality via APIs, allowing fintech partners to plug directly into its ecosystem . This platform approach accelerates innovation and expands service offerings.

Modular Security and Regulatory Agility

Security in Composable Banking is granular. Each module is independently secured and monitored. When a vulnerability arises, only the affected module is updated, reducing systemic risk. 

Modular compliance tools allow banks to implement regulatory changes in targeted modules, minimizing disruption and reducing compliance incidents by up to 40%.

Implementing Composable Banking: A Professional Roadmap

Steps to Adopt Composable Banking

Assessment: Audit the current tech stack to identify legacy bottlenecks and prioritize modules for replacement.

Partner Selection: Choose technology providers with robust APIs and proven composable solutions.

Phased Rollout: Start with non-core modules, such as onboarding or payments, then move to mission-critical functions.

Cultural Shift: Foster collaboration between IT, compliance, and business teams.

Continuous Improvement: Monitor performance and customer feedback; upgrade or replace modules as needed.

Change Management and Organizational Impact

Transitioning to Composable Banking requires more than technology. It demands a shift in mindset—one that values agility, cross-functional collaboration, and ongoing optimization. Leadership must champion this change, ensuring alignment across business, compliance, and IT.

Strategic Implications for Financial Leaders

It is not a passing trend. For CIOs, CTOs, and banking executives, it is a strategic imperative. The benefits—accelerated innovation, lower costs, improved compliance, and superior customer experiences—are clear and measurable. 

The transition, however, requires vision, planning, and a willingness to embrace modular thinking.

Conclusion: The Future of Composable Banking

Composable Banking is rewriting the rules of financial technology. The monolithic core is giving way to a modular, API-driven ecosystem—one that is agile, resilient, and ready for the future. 

For financial institutions seeking to future-proof their tech stack, the roadmap is clear: embrace Composable Banking, invest in modularity, and build a platform that can evolve with the market.

The next chapter in banking will not be written by those who cling to the past, but by those who build, adapt, and innovate—module by module, API by API.

Frequently Asked Questions 

1. What is Composable Banking?

It is a modular approach to building banking technology where financial institutions use interchangeable, API-driven components to create flexible, scalable, and easily upgradable systems. This enables faster innovation, improved customer experience, and reduced operational risks.

2. What does Composable Architecture mean in banking?

It refers to designing software systems as a collection of independent, reusable modules that communicate via APIs. In banking, this means core functions like payments, onboarding, and compliance can be managed separately but work seamlessly together.

3. How is Composable Architecture different from Microservices?

While both involve modular design, Composable Architecture emphasizes business-driven, interchangeable modules that can be combined or replaced easily, often with a focus on no-code/low-code adaptability. Microservices focus more on breaking down applications into small, independently deployable services, primarily from a development perspective.

4. Why is Composable Architecture important for financial institutions?

It allows banks to rapidly adapt to changing market demands, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. It reduces dependency on legacy systems, accelerates product launches, and improves operational resilience.

7. What are the benefits of using a Composable no-code Platform in banking?

A Composable No Code Platform empowers business users and developers to build, customize, and deploy banking modules without extensive coding. This accelerates innovation, reduces IT backlog, and enables faster adaptation to customer needs and compliance changes.

8. How can banks implement Composable Banking effectively?

Banks should start with a thorough assessment of their current tech stack, select partners with strong API capabilities, adopt a phased rollout starting with non-core modules, and foster a culture of collaboration across IT, compliance, and business units.

Share This Video, Choose Your Platform!
Scroll to Top
Kalki Yasas
Kalki Yasas Veeraraghava

President - Sales, BFSI-India

Yasas Kalki is the President of Sales – India. Having 25+ years of industry experience, he spent 12 years at Salesforce, achieving outstanding sales performance and building strong client relationships in the Enterprise business. He has also worked at Accenture, Infosys, GE Capital, Innoveer Solutions, and Sonata Software.